Постметафізика соціуму та історії

Abstract

Обґрунтовується ефективність та цінність постметафізичного мислення у сфері гуманітарного знання та пізнання, у збагненні буття та у дослідженні історії й соціуму. Особлива увага приділяється вирішенню питання про взаємозв’язок трансцендентного та іманентного у життєдіяльності людей, взаємодії метафізичного світу з життєвим світом людей, соціальним простором, свідомістю емпіричних суб’єктів. Автор дослідження приходить до висновку, що метафізичний простір існує і функціонує як самостійний світ, який можна порівняти зі штучним інтелектом. Це є наш світ і, водночас, не лише «наш» світ; це є світ, яким неможливо опанувати, підкорити нашому контролю, керувати ним.Attempts to study history using analytical metaphysics are considered in both ontological and epistemological aspects. The effectiveness and value of post-metaphysical thinking in humanitarian knowledge and cognition, in comprehending existence and studying history is substantiated. Particular attention is paid to solving the issue of the relationship between the transcendental and the immanent in people’s lives, the interaction of the metaphysical world with the life world of people, social space, and the consciousnesses of empirical subjects. The aim and tasks are: to study the experience of using post-metaphysics as theoretical thinking in the knowledge of the principles of being and the subsequent use of metaphysical discourse, and its heuristic capabilities in the study of society and its history. Research methods. According to the research, historical-philosophical, historical and interdisciplinary approaches are based on the principles of sociocultural understanding of scientific knowledge, methods of hermeneutics and axiologists. Research results. Metaphysics is included in social consciousness, social space, and the activities of many empirical individuals, whose consciousness combines the rational and irrational, conscious and unconscious, logic and experiences, and mental and emotional. The metaphysical whole, formed based on ideas, thoughts, values, and the entire content of the consciousness of individual people, is not their sum, a mechanical unification of individual consciousnesses. It will rather be a synthesis of ideas, concepts, teachings, and principles, "withdrawn" from individual consciousnesses and in this form appears to be a qualitatively new phenomenon. Society, culture, and history, as we know, "answer" our questions, but we ask them, and the answers to them depend on our formulation of problems. Discussion. In modern philosophical and historical literature, a new form of historicism and meaningful justification of the meaning and purpose of history is being formed. Classical and new historicism share a historical view of things, which assumes that we are all inside something that once began and will end sometime. The differences are related to the development of the historical process itself, the transformation of its political and legal institutions, and ideas about it as a sequential connection of individual and unique events. Conclusions. The functioning and development of society, in contrast to the natural process, is irrational and illogical; it cannot be described by the concepts, principles and categories of classical science; there is something inaccessible to us and incomprehensible to us. That is why history is always a mystery that cannot be completely resolved.